Re: Some clarifications and a plea
Eric Sammer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.installer |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Andrew Gaffney wrote: > I was under the impression that the "back end" was going to be written > in such a way that it allowed for the creation of different frontends, That is true. > not necessarily written in the same language as the backend (Python in > this case). That is not. It's in the docs. > This all stems from the idea of separation of FE and BE, which in my > opinion (not that it counts for anything), is a good thing. Yes. > I don't think that anyone is *really* reading that ;) To be blunt, anyone who wants to be involved in any meaningful way will just have to do so. Not to be argumentative about it, but I will just refuse to answer the same questions 50 times because someone "is too busy" to read a two page document. I am "too busy" to explain it, hence the creation of the document. -- Eric Sammer Gentoo Linux http://www.gentoo.org
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 252 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAICOlD/V/IA6/2WURAi35AJ9Ef7dA9tkOcF01wch7uQ/NcjDtAACcCOZU Ehf/1rOAsBFzUS5nhunx6fQ= =y9d9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----