Re: Gentoo installer vs current installation method, what about later?
Chris Gianelloni <[email protected]> Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:43:53 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.installer |
|---|---|
| Organization | Gentoo Linux |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 15:41 -0400, Michael Crute wrote: > Why not replace the minimal livecd too? Just add an option to do > graphical or "expert" install when you boot the livecd. That would > help you guys not have to generate so many CD images plus you get the > best of both worlds. Pretty much the only thing you would do is dump > people into a terminal instead of starting X for an expert install, > all the tools would still be there. Anyhow... just my $0.02 The graphical install is started manually, anyway. You can also boot the CD with "nox" to get to a terminal. The reason for the minimal CD is simple, size. If you don't plan on doing anything but a stage1 installation, a minimal CD + stage1 tarball is a lot less to download than a 700MB ISO image. Basically, you've suggested a capability the CD can already do. ;] -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDVrAJkT4lNIS36YERAqqQAKCvUD7NUriow6d/Kiytq6OF8FgluwCgkoP/ I85oSHPmq6HgYZ0H11XgMEU= =gKz4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----