Re: Patch for LIBRARY_PATH support in gjl

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Petteri Räty wrote:
> 
> Alistair John Bush kirjoitti:
>> Here is a patch to allow users to configure a packages LIBRARY_PATH via
>>
> 
> I think it should be either JAVA_LIBRARY_PATH or  LD_LIBRARY_PATH.

Using a simple test:
public class pathtest {
    public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
        System.out.println("library path: " +
System.getProperty("java.library.path"));
    }
}

Only LD_LIBRARY_PATH was affecting the output, and setting a
- -Djava.library.path has overriden it. Including the defaults of JDK!
That's probably another problem, maybe it should also add LDPATH from
the VM's env file?
And related to https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125563 add some
sane defaults like /lib:/usr/lib ...

> The reason I have LIBRARY_PATH is that is what is stored in package.env.

That doesn't matter, package.env is our artifact, not everything there
is usually used in the real env :)

> And this way they will have to explicitly add additional library paths
> to a package.

If someone sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH then he expects it to be used
everywhere, why force another var for java.

> What do you think?

I'm for LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Or as compromise, append both LD_ and JAVA_
variables. That way one can set additional paths for java without
affecting everything else.

- --
Vlastimil Babka (Caster)
Gentoo/Java
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGSDSltbrAj05h3oQRAur0AJ9aQfyi0b2ElKQMjIkhYxpIml8iYwCfUJED
PU0m/QkhqrU3gIQNoJUkY0U=
=JH+j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
[email protected] mailing list