Re: Why are the binay plugs so big?

Kelly O'Hair kirjoitti:
> Your observations are correct.
> Initially it wasn't 100% clear what binary plugs were necessary, and it
> was easiest to just refer to a previously built jdk install tree.
> 
> Given more time these bundles would have been stripped down to the bare
> minimum, and that may still happen in the future.
> But would you rather we spent our time getting rid of the binary plug
> dependency, or reducing it's size?
> 

Well at least reduced binary plug would be provide a good reference on
what is still encumbered on what is not.

Regards,
Petteri

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGSiC2cxLzpIGCsLQRAlZzAJ0RSnCH9eZIsMpxRRvauz56rOWhsQCeJZlT
enqbs1epZkVp4EbeqMs5mOI=
=90uY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----