Re: Handling broken javadoc in >=sun-jdk-1.6
Craig Raw <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.java |
|---|---|
| Organization | Quirk |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all, I've noticed Java 6u2 has just been released. AFAIK, bug 6507179 (http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6507179) was keeping Java 6 masked on Gentoo - it has been fixed in this release. Does this help in terms of getting Java 6 stable? Or am I way out of date? Ciao, Craig Alistair Bush wrote: > what an absolute bugger!! I wish java would let us win at least one > battle. > > On 1/21/07, *Petteri Räty* <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158720 > <https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158720> > > So some packages fail to build javadocs with >=sun-jdk-1.6. As everyone > did not seem to be aware on how to handled this the right DEPEND > atom is: > doc? ( || ( =virtual/jdk-1.4* = virtual/jdk-1.5* ) ) > !doc? ( >=virtual/jdk-1.4 ) > > RDEPEND: > >=virtual/jre-1.4 > > Regards, > Petteri > > PS. If someone was wondering, this bug prevents sun-jdk-1.6 going stable > until all packages have been tested to build javadocs with it. > -- > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> mailing list > > -- [email protected] mailing list