Re: Handling broken javadoc in >=sun-jdk-1.6

Craig Raw <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.gentoo.java
Organization Quirk
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi all,

I've noticed Java 6u2 has just been released. AFAIK, bug 6507179 
(http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6507179) was keeping Java 6 masked on Gentoo - 
it has been fixed in this release.

Does this help in terms of getting Java 6 stable? Or am I way out of date?

Ciao,
Craig


Alistair Bush wrote:
> what an absolute bugger!!   I wish java would let us win at least one 
> battle.
> 
> On 1/21/07, *Petteri Räty* <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>     https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158720
>     <https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158720>
> 
>     So some packages fail to build javadocs with >=sun-jdk-1.6. As everyone
>     did not seem to be aware on how to handled this the right DEPEND
>     atom is:
>     doc? ( || ( =virtual/jdk-1.4* = virtual/jdk-1.5* ) )
>     !doc? ( >=virtual/jdk-1.4 )
> 
>     RDEPEND:
>      >=virtual/jre-1.4
> 
>     Regards,
>     Petteri
> 
>     PS. If someone was wondering, this bug prevents sun-jdk-1.6 going stable
>     until all packages have been tested to build javadocs with it.
>     --
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> mailing list
> 
> 

-- 
[email protected] mailing list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.