Re: QA: java-experimental

Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
 > I've fixed few packages, and... leesten carefully... I'm going to say
this only
> once: next person to commit an ebuild with KEYWORDS="" (or KEYWORDS="-*") will
> be punished... Alistair will send an e-mail every 10 minutes until the ebuild
> gets proper keywords and ends up in package.mask.
> 

Oh shit

/me runs back to reverse all the commits in which I dropped all
keywords.  ;)

On a more serious note.

KEYWORDS="-*" is bad!!! and if I see anymore of it an email every 10
minutes will be the last of anyones problems.

but im not that concerned about KEYWORDS=""

I dropped keywords on a few packages in java-overlay because there deps
weren't satisfied within gentoo or java-overlay ( I didn't check
java-experimental unless it was obvious to me. aka hibernate-annotations
). Eventually there will be an email going around with a list of ebuilds
that have no keywords.  These will either be junkyarded or moved to
java-experimental (if that satisfies them).

> Can we get commit hook that does some basic QA and aborts the commit if there
> are QA errors (and some warning)?

I will look into this at some point.  I suppose there are many things we
could do to help maintain qa.  I suppose we also need more overview of
our contributors.  So I might attempt to generate reports, etc of
commits by those users.