Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Eric Chatellier <[email protected]> Sun, 22 May 2011 16:54:45 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.java |
|---|---|
| Organization | Codelutin |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le 22/05/2011 07:38, Kasun Gajasinghe a =C3=A9crit : > Hi all, > I'm working on getting Apache Maven in to work by building from > source. Currently, in main tree, Maven is installed using the binary > (dev-java/maven-bin), which is against the Gentoo Java Packaging > Policy. > > Getting Maven in to work by building-from-source is a lengthy process. > We have two main versions to go ahead. The 2.x range with the latest > being v2.2.1, and the 3.x range with the latest being v3.0.3. The > compatibility notes for 2.x and 3.x are at [1]. There's only few > compatibility issues as I've seen. I was thinking to go with 2.x since > in my experience and the area where I was involved in, haven't had any > plans to migrate to Maven 3.x soon. But the overall picture may vary. > > So, I'm asking from the Gentoo's Java community, what's the suitable > version to go with? 2.x or 3.x Hi, i'm a gentoo user and java developper using maven for years. I also known the maven gentoo problem ;) So i'll be happy to help you or test your work. For maven 2/3, 3.x is a new achitecture intended to be maven 2 complaint. So, i vote for 3.x. But maybe 3.x is too young... --=20 =C3=89ric Chatellier <[email protected]> Tel: 02.40.50.29.28 http://www.codelutin.com