Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?

Petteri Räty <[email protected]> Tue, 24 May 2011 12:07:10 +0300
Newsgroups gmane.linux.gentoo.java
Message-ID <[email protected]>
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigC613DF5971056EDB731ABC25
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 05/23/2011 07:52 PM, Kasun Gajasinghe wrote:

>>
>> maven-bin 2.x support continues to work through the binary package?
>=20
> Yes, we can keep supporting maven-bin 2.x for maven users. Though the
> packagers of projects based on maven won't be able to use the support
> for maven 2.x if we start with 3.x.This project's focus is more
> towards packagers, right?  I think Serkan or people who are more
> familiar with this can give an exact answer.
>=20

So are you discussing which version of Maven to build from source or
which version to target ebuild infrastructure for? Those two don't
necessarily need to be the same and your topic implied the former but
the above talks about the latter. The ebuild infrastructure for Maven
based projects should work just the same regardless of whether the maven
package itself is built from source or not. Our target is of course to
get rid of all binary packages but I consider this thread about asking
about priorities. For ebuild infrastructure targeting 2.x is fine if the
large majority of projects that will start using the work are using 2.x.
Otherwise I think my earlier logic still applies.

Regards,
Petteri


--------------enigC613DF5971056EDB731ABC25
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=HGTF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigC613DF5971056EDB731ABC25--