RE: cups ebuild error

"Kerin Millar" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.gentoo.newbies
Message-ID <F6EDFA037E2BA541851DFEFDAF759EB90B46CA@newmedia-serve.newmedia-lan.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Not sure what the CUPS problems are about, although I agree with Chris
that the forums are a good place to look. See also if the problem has
been confirmed at bugs.gentoo.org.

> > This morning I downloaded the 1.15_r1 (or was it 1.1.15_r1) source 
> > tarball from the cups site, ran thru the install. After that, I 
> > checked whether emerge would see that cups was already 
> compiled from 
> > source on my system (Didn't off course :-/ ) Apparently the 

Use the inject feature of Portage to make Portage think that an ebuild
has been merged even if it hasn't, like so:

	emerge -i net-print/cups

You can clean it up in the usual way (it won't touch your manually
compiled CUPS):

	emerge -C net-print/cups

> > gentoo-cups-ebuild says it's version 1.1.15_R2 (although 
> cups.org only 
> > has a r1-build???).

Gentoo build maintainers may make subtle modifications to the ebuild
file itself (such as adding a command to apply a post-release patch - if
you look, you will see that two patches are applied in the src_unpack()
section - maybe that is what is causing the problem for you?). It's
still the CUPS release that you refer to. You can see what the
difference is by examining the ChangeLog:

	less /usr/portage/net-print/cups/ChangeLog

In this case, they added a missing dependency (for Ghostscript) and some
PPC specific compile options. Also, there is something in the ebuild
that makes sure the libs are correctly linked so have a look at that if
you need to use your own compiled version.

- --kerframil
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6-2 (MingW32)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEUEARECAAYFAj2bCTsACgkQe1jWXPxWAXIrNACeLS98LGq26AqqKeiWgLrR5bT1
mNwAmM12Ohm4KDciyrm/rZQQGW0dd5Y=
=VAtC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.