RE: cups ebuild error
"Kerin Millar" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.newbies |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <F6EDFA037E2BA541851DFEFDAF759EB90B46CA@newmedia-serve.newmedia-lan.net> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Not sure what the CUPS problems are about, although I agree with Chris that the forums are a good place to look. See also if the problem has been confirmed at bugs.gentoo.org. > > This morning I downloaded the 1.15_r1 (or was it 1.1.15_r1) source > > tarball from the cups site, ran thru the install. After that, I > > checked whether emerge would see that cups was already > compiled from > > source on my system (Didn't off course :-/ ) Apparently the Use the inject feature of Portage to make Portage think that an ebuild has been merged even if it hasn't, like so: emerge -i net-print/cups You can clean it up in the usual way (it won't touch your manually compiled CUPS): emerge -C net-print/cups > > gentoo-cups-ebuild says it's version 1.1.15_R2 (although > cups.org only > > has a r1-build???). Gentoo build maintainers may make subtle modifications to the ebuild file itself (such as adding a command to apply a post-release patch - if you look, you will see that two patches are applied in the src_unpack() section - maybe that is what is causing the problem for you?). It's still the CUPS release that you refer to. You can see what the difference is by examining the ChangeLog: less /usr/portage/net-print/cups/ChangeLog In this case, they added a missing dependency (for Ghostscript) and some PPC specific compile options. Also, there is something in the ebuild that makes sure the libs are correctly linked so have a look at that if you need to use your own compiled version. - --kerframil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6-2 (MingW32) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEUEARECAAYFAj2bCTsACgkQe1jWXPxWAXIrNACeLS98LGq26AqqKeiWgLrR5bT1 mNwAmM12Ohm4KDciyrm/rZQQGW0dd5Y= =VAtC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----