Re: Gentoo-performance forum?

Joel Merrick <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.gentoo.performance
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Daniel Armyr wrote:

>Which parameters do you intend on including?
>Only hardware or kernel-configs as well? Compiler flags?
>Hardware settings?
>  
>

All to be honest, include as many fields as possible, but not make them 
compulsary

Please help me elaborate if possible

Here's the current list..

_Hardware Specifics_

Architecture
CPU
Motherboard
Bus Speed
Clock Speed
RAM Type
RAM Amount
RAM Speed
Video Card Type
Video Card RAM Amount
Video Card RAM Speed

_Build and Environment Specifics_

CFLAGS
LDFLAGS
etc

_Kernel Specifics_

Kernel Type & Version (from Vanilla)
Kernel Patchsets (gentoo, ck, love, nitro etc..)
Build date
Other Parameters
PLUS MAYBE AN OPTION TO UPLOAD YOUR .config??!!
etc

_Sys Specifics_

sysctl tuning
Other tuning

_X Specifics_

Xfree/Xorg version
USE flags used to compile?

_HD Specifics_

hdparm settings
RAID?
What RAID Level?

_BENCHMARKS!!_

It may be best to define what the delegated system task is.. I mean, 
it's no point running Xfbench for a non-X server, of course!

Plus games would prefer graphics and systems benchmarkis, rather than a 
DB benchmark..

There's a lot of software out there, that benchmark a lot of programs 
and a lot of subsystems!


Plus maybe percieved performace increases, like prelinking, editing 
boot-up scripts etc..



I'm sure there's a lot of points of contention there, plus a hell of a 
lot I've missed out...

Feel free to rip apart at will.


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Joel Merrick [mailto:[email protected]] 
>Sent: den 12 oktober 2004 12:39
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] Gentoo-performance forum?
>
>
>Lance Albertson wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Roman Gaufman wrote:
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>I think it would be a good idea to have a gentoo-performance forum 
>>>section, so performance related threads wont have to go to "Other 
>>>Things Gentoo". Your thoughts?
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>I just chatted with one of the forums admins and he said that we won't 
>>be adding any new forums until phpBB 2.2 is released. Thats mainly 
>>because managing with the current version is a major PITA from what I 
>>hear. *BUT* That doesn't mean that you'll see this forum created. The 
>>forums are currently structured more in a "task/purpose than by goal" 
>>way. So, having a goal of performance wouldn't really fit the structure
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>we have right now.
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>Just to let you peeps now, I've been thinking about this last night and 
>I'd love it if there was just a (simple) form where people could enter 
>their system credentials and benchmark results.
>
>I'm going to do a little bit of investigation tonight in terms of 
>looking at standardised benchmarks.. I believe, from a bit of searching,
>
>that the whole arena of benchmarking is a big mamma!
>
>Wish me luck! If I get anything that looks like a go-er, I'll fire a 
>(probably crap) PHP page together, where people can input their system 
>specifics... and list them in a grid-matrix kinda view (it'd be a bit 
>easier to read than just forum posts i.m.h.o. and may provide a decent 
>intermediate until someone works out a MUCH clever system, lol)
>
>Does anyone know if there's anything like this for other distros 
>(although due to Gentoo's lurvely package build system, I doubt we'd be 
>able to draw true comparisons)
>
>Sorry if i'm rambling.... heh.
>
>--
>[email protected] mailing list
>
>
>
>
>--
>[email protected] mailing list
>
>  
>


--
[email protected] mailing list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.