Re: Re: How is it possible ???

Chris Frey <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.gentoo.performance
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 12:09:52PM +0100, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> While I certainly won't stop you from doing this, please keep in mind that 
> there might be rather subtle bugs (depending on your cflags) that occur.
> Also the current gcc streams (every release gets better) can and will produce 
> broken code for certain uncommon code/flag combinations. For example sse2 
> support is known to be an issue esp. with the older versions, but the newer 
> versions also aren't perfect. As people use different compiler versions on 
> different architectures (i386 is the best tested/most bugfree), many ebuilds 
> need to be a bit conservative and filter out more common flags that are 
> broken for this package.

This is interesting information, but perhaps there should be another flag (heh)
that turns off this compiler flag modification, for those that really want
to do it.

I can see how stability is important and expected, especially in glibc,
and this "how to get a stable build at all costs" info is important, and not
to be lost.  But it would be nice to have the Gentoo cake and eat it too, :-)
turning off this safety net when one really wants to experiment and perhaps
help flush out the bugs that make this net necessary in the first place.

Is there a way to do this easily and I just don't know it?

Thanks,
- Chris


--
[email protected] mailing list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.