Re: Re: How is it possible ???

On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 21:55 -0500, Ted Rodgers wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 January 2005 04:46, William Kenworthy wrote:
> >> Have a read of the ebuild - compiling gentoo with your own choice of
> >> optimisations is is almost a myth!  There's been some interesting
> >> threads about the predominance of flag filtering and how it often seems
> >> to be used with little cause.
> >
> > I have a hacked gcc-config profile that calls a perl script for all the
> > gcc
> > executables that forces my cflags to be what I want and aside from ten
> > packages on my entire system I'm able to run without any problems.  That
> > includes X (though not glibc).  I think strip-compiler flags might be a
> > good
> > idea for some systems but clearly on mine it's not necessary.
> >
> > --
> > You can get so much more with a kind word and a two-by-four than you
> > can get with just a kind word.
> > ...
> > Patrick Audley                          [email protected]
> > Blackcat Systems                        http://blackcat.ca
> >              Bringing Elegance to Complexity
> 
> If you read the dev docs, it is possible to stop portage from stripping
> flags.
FEATURES=nostrip USE=debug emerge foo

> 
> Ted
> 
> 
> >
> > --
> > [email protected] mailing list
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> [email protected] mailing list
> 
-- 
 .+"+.+"+.+"+.+"+.+"+.+"+.+"+.+"+.+"+.+"+.+"+.+"+.+"+.+"+.+"+.
( AIM:    EvilComputer69                    YIM:  MighMoS     )
 )MSN:    [email protected]        ICQ:  161301521  (
( Jabber: [email protected]                SILC: MighMoS     )
 "+.+"+.+"+.+"+.+"+.+"+.+"+.+"+.+"+.+"+.+"+.+"+.+"+.+"+.+"+.+"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBB40LcN7YJmgYMk4YRAvL7AKCGa13NE4vLX5goRWDR0cYGN5TiEwCff72y
XjQKJkwOCQraF6M3Job4Vq4=
=R1vn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----