Re: gentoo-performance

darren kirby <[email protected]> Thu, 19 Jan 2006 23:44:57 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.linux.gentoo.performance
Organization Badcomputer Org.
Message-ID <[email protected]>
quoth the Christopher Bergström:
>  darren kirby wrote:
> quoth the Jeremy Brake:
>
> How about speeding up the wait time on updating the portage cache after
> a sync.. even on my AMD 64 3500 it takes a number of minutes to chug
> through..
> are there any known ways to "vrrmmm" this up a little?
>
>
> +1
>
> Mine sped up for all of a day, but is slow as molasses once again. If I did
> my syncs during the day it might even peeve me...
>
>  What kind of hardware are you guys running on?  My laptop isn't on cron
> and I do it every couple days or so and it finishes in around 15-30
> minutes.. I've never really paid any attention.. How long is yours taking?

It doesn't make a difference what hardware. I have 4 boxes that run gentoo 
(Athlon 2200, Athlon 3200, Apple G4, Sparc U60) and they all run the actual 
sync quite fast, but the 50%-51% takes from 5 minutes on the 3200 to 30 
minutes on the G4 and U60.

As I mentioned though, I don't let this bother me as I generally sync ~4:00am 
whilst sleeping.

>  What I am curious about is... what's it really doing when it says 51-52%..
> That 1% seems to take forever..
>
>  C.
>    -- [email protected] mailing list
-d
-- 
darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org
"...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected..."
- Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBD0JUBwPD5Cr/3CJgRAocUAKDz/z5bvbrzR4+MpW5saWc55Xk/CwCeMwoH
Zr9YsNHZ8hn4BYuhXRbLG40=
=nWXS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----