Re: Hardened-performance

Florian Philipp <lists@f_philipp.fastmail.net> Sun, 13 Jul 2008 14:02:56 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.gentoo.performance
Organization German Aerospace Center
Message-ID <20080713140256.0d7c6e0f@NOTE_GENTOO64.PHHEIMNETZ>
--Sig_/vt_v6JjGJtddW.VSZzPijbI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:53:36 +0200
Florian Philipp <lists@f_philipp.fastmail.net> wrote:

> Hi list!
>=20
> Can anyone tell me if using a hardened-profile has any performance
> implications?
>=20
> To be more specific:
>=20
> I use an AMD64 X2 for realtime video encoding and some network
> services and the company I work for uses some of their (Intranet web
> and file) servers for high performance computing. Would using stuff
> like PaX reduce, for example, memory allocation, memory access and
> context switching?

Never mind, just found this myself:
http://www.pjvenda.org/linux/doc/pax-performance/

Quote:"AMD64, PPC64, Alpha and other architectures benefit with PaX's
PAGEEXEC memory protection at no cost whatsoever!"

--Sig_/vt_v6JjGJtddW.VSZzPijbI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkh57vQACgkQqs4uOUlOuU/ztwCcDc6/yQ7A577PUTYhskz/A9hU
XCcAnjT8xuhrEFpahO+P8IgeYdp0Ixs3
=lYEm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/vt_v6JjGJtddW.VSZzPijbI--
-- 
[email protected] mailing list