Re: Hardened-performance
Florian Philipp <lists@f_philipp.fastmail.net> Sun, 13 Jul 2008 14:02:56 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.performance |
|---|---|
| Organization | German Aerospace Center |
| Message-ID | <20080713140256.0d7c6e0f@NOTE_GENTOO64.PHHEIMNETZ> |
--Sig_/vt_v6JjGJtddW.VSZzPijbI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:53:36 +0200 Florian Philipp <lists@f_philipp.fastmail.net> wrote: > Hi list! >=20 > Can anyone tell me if using a hardened-profile has any performance > implications? >=20 > To be more specific: >=20 > I use an AMD64 X2 for realtime video encoding and some network > services and the company I work for uses some of their (Intranet web > and file) servers for high performance computing. Would using stuff > like PaX reduce, for example, memory allocation, memory access and > context switching? Never mind, just found this myself: http://www.pjvenda.org/linux/doc/pax-performance/ Quote:"AMD64, PPC64, Alpha and other architectures benefit with PaX's PAGEEXEC memory protection at no cost whatsoever!" --Sig_/vt_v6JjGJtddW.VSZzPijbI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkh57vQACgkQqs4uOUlOuU/ztwCcDc6/yQ7A577PUTYhskz/A9hU XCcAnjT8xuhrEFpahO+P8IgeYdp0Ixs3 =lYEm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/vt_v6JjGJtddW.VSZzPijbI-- -- [email protected] mailing list