Re: Speeding up Tree Verification

"Sid Spry" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.gentoo.portage.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020, at 1:40 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 30-06-2020 13:13:29 -0500, Sid Spry wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020, at 1:20 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On 29-06-2020 21:13:43 -0500, Sid Spry wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > > 
> > > > I have some runnable pseudocode outlining a faster tree verification algorithm.
> > > > Before I create patches I'd like to see if there is any guidance on making the
> > > > changes as unobtrusive as possible. If the radical change in algorithm is
> > > > acceptable I can work on adding the changes.
> > > > 
> > > > Instead of composing any kind of structured data out of the portage tree my
> > > > algorithm just lists all files and then optionally batches them out to threads.
> > > > There is a noticeable speedup by eliding the tree traversal operations which
> > > > can be seen when running the algorithm with a single thread and comparing it to
> > > > the current algorithm in gemato (which should still be discussed here?).
> > > 
> > > I remember something that gemato used to use multiple threads, but
> > > because it totally saturated disk-IO, it was brought back to a single
> > > thread.  People were complaining about unusable systems.
> > > 
> > 
> > I think this is an argument for cgroups limits support on the portage process or
> > account as opposed to an argument against picking a better algorithm. That is
> > something I have been working towards, but I am only one man.
> 
> But this requires a) cgroups support, and b) the privileges to use it.
> Shouldn't be a problem in the normal case, but just saying.
> 

cgroups kernel support is a fairly common dependency. It can obviously be optional,
I am thinking related to MAKEOPTS or EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS (see: rustc/cargo not
respecting or being passed -j/-l as another use for cgroups) and supported best-effort,
but is there any reason to expect it to not be enabled?

If the user isn't either root or portage I think it reasonable to leave resource management
to the machine's administrator.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.