Re: [PATCH 2/2] lib/_emerge/resolver/output_helpers.py: explicitly state 'all satisfied'
Sam James <[email protected]> Thu, 7 Oct 2021 03:39:56 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.portage.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On 6 Oct 2021, at 19:05, Duncan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sam James posted on Sat, 2 Oct 2021 21:11:56 +0100 as excerpted: > >> This makes things a bit less confusing and tries to avoid users focusing >> on (soft) blocks which aren't actually the problem they're hitting. > > I was pleasantly surprised by that "all satisfied" earlier today. > Thanks. I could get my brain around the old format but this is /so/ much > nicer! =:^) > Big thanks for giving this positive feedback! Great motivator :) And glad it helped! Best, sam
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 618 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAEBCgB9FiEEYOpPv/uDUzOcqtTy9JIoEO6gSDsFAmFeXfxfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDYw RUE0RkJGRkI4MzUzMzM5Q0FBRDRGMkY0OTIyODEwRUVBMDQ4M0IACgkQ9JIoEO6g SDt9EwgAqM/T9gz0ENHJFtyMhvKkPfptu50RwR8h3TA80Qg/OO50f1RdmeWfLER2 hicnhsTNRHt6alSs1oZgA8RgcjUQ75NVIKQhXUsOHGjZsreyFruURs9c5BwHcDLf 09SeHeEpHN8ippnUpiKzheNYtJRjFf631d+JDiMY2uAw8Zaaxv5VmiY/b1eg7MhI PXcGwgw/k+ew8TKmPXd4ntMuwhuKOWa4WmI3Uug/OVBlvu9Vmi1MZViUA35gGebP UQna+4pFebfRXNqapumKkzMHsjS11uauMxSugz6P2oGotN8fJivtuLWkGpYyom55 yClz+Mb/L/pI8gFw+Xow3Ky1Z+MWyQ== =mnoH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----