Re: usage of /bin/bash in shebangs
Fabian Groffen <[email protected]> Mon, 25 Jul 2022 08:17:46 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.portage.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Gentoo Foundation, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--J8CzYCIazyZxvYxW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 24-07-2022 13:58:31 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: > On 7/24/22 12:29, Fabian Groffen wrote: > > Hi, > >=20 > > Quick question, I noticed that portage uses /bin/bash hardcoded in > > shebang of scripts, while it uses /usr/bin/env python for python > > executable files. > >=20 > > Is there anything against using /usr/bin/env bash for shell scripts? > > Changing this would help for Prefix. >=20 >=20 > I can't think of any reason not to do this. Do you want to see a patch, or is it OK to push this myself? Thanks, Fabian --=20 Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level --J8CzYCIazyZxvYxW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEELUvHd/Gtp7LaU1vuzpXahU5EQpMFAmLeNYoACgkQzpXahU5E QpPbdgf+K66dBx0/yLcn6WTdOj14cvJrdCIp41LjtHgENKiip7zprC6w8t1NtAxP cI7N10JQKTyTxEhFzywDU5KF1f4iVrmzgjet1I6uqMTzvulT9B/8+pKWbpaiyFrw zjsuDLfAf9m5D6gYmOvWdm2Y1snybnn8s7k63wpVdkJd+GwhhYAn6zvRL9WmUD8O rhr7cheNxZTS3T3Or+zEKP8o/1FujDLc2kDHyRHCPjkYd1N54mJE+ROCO/4AGiEg OTpCKJBcKRC2MTspyA2cAjKkuX/QZYH4Y30oqu7QtWhCqucu6mDL3W5bSOAkXAWy t2p4ESFJYUjcXxnzW7+c7ZjYwgxD9w== =sRpc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J8CzYCIazyZxvYxW--