Re: usage of /bin/bash in shebangs

--ipFm/iTNyyqGp8Ha
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 25-07-2022 08:09:02 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 7/24/22 23:17, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > On 24-07-2022 13:58:31 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> >> On 7/24/22 12:29, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Quick question, I noticed that portage uses /bin/bash hardcoded in
> >>> shebang of scripts, while it uses /usr/bin/env python for python
> >>> executable files.
> >>>
> >>> Is there anything against using /usr/bin/env bash for shell scripts?
> >>> Changing this would help for Prefix.
> >>
> >>
> >> I can't think of any reason not to do this.
> >=20
> > Do you want to see a patch, or is it OK to push this myself?
>=20
> It's OK to just push this yourself. Thanks!

Pushed, thanks, b716e3591


--=20
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level

--ipFm/iTNyyqGp8Ha
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEELUvHd/Gtp7LaU1vuzpXahU5EQpMFAmLetHoACgkQzpXahU5E
QpM2NggAiakNQVyMW7+Pjg8xF44HnKHG4HZ1TDBwW3oEdfBfIsj/MbXvzww6oyWS
fbg4LMdOdXtzmN+n/9h7CXXbqvqjV/STu0Ox/z6r6NofNRua12zKz5g7n2pl+7rm
4g8A2Kbbfrbofl/TXdjCX13pUOmO1JBKfnvNwrtpe5gbTBOscQ2dQfTYC/bUIA9f
jXZ4kNMz5y2bmHu5Ur+9et4xawPv2G0HS8GToV1E0Ol9jD3YCTV2AKAZP8PVTZat
UKt1Z1wfKuuS8Ie17rt+dqV2azvBdhMuDUq6uDAJF8///WrjpRmXRhJM1W+fV7lQ
znos0ow3bpjZnGl+jxml4xW5eG0qRA==
=Nq2c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ipFm/iTNyyqGp8Ha--