Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/4] Add package.license support to profiles

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

>>>>> On Wed, 17 Dec 2025, Louis Chauvet wrote:

> Currently profiles does not allow using per-package license unmasking.
> The only solution is the LICENSE variable, which apply to all the packages.

What would be the application for this? I understand package.license
in user configuration, but why would we ever want to unmask nonfree
per-package licenses in profiles?

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQFfBAEBCABJFiEEtDnZ1O9xIP68rzDbUYgzUIhBXi4FAmlCePwbFIAAAAAABAAO
bWFudTIsMi41KzEuMTEsMiwyDxx1bG1AZ2VudG9vLm9yZwAKCRBRiDNQiEFeLgKJ
B/9wtaua5LvDcRd/4iNRi/RmrQhgn30VbsrPqssaI6PczE3VCt0NGtAEB6vk7zcA
/6fLEXdm/Vg+w1GDFJv6FNw5WjLy+5TCrTuQgKhui5a9ma+XJMVCCpElqasHJ8tQ
N8zAlkPwr+rDPEf0/IMz4uJyhFQtBq9p0bjb1gL/M4UPp1SptyYmrx9TdsIFeclF
v7Mhaw9ODkeAkQ58FYKb0xUQyqvP3SfmCeyLbriZmZKOIAgRN7zA2d8C1KOmU5yM
tP+36R7E1thlgy2mP/qgzsPNVwlpjP5oJzqilPlPa5vvsxh0QZTkZIThZ0I2ioXv
/p19njj7w+9Ag9hehO/24m5D
=5Qvg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--