Re: PPC cflags
Erik Zeek <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.ppc |
|---|---|
| Organization | The University of Georgia |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun February 20 2005 11:41 am, Nick Smith wrote: > <quote who="Erik Zeek"> > > > On Sat February 19 2005 10:18 pm, Carl Hudkins wrote: > >> On Sat February 19 2005 21:49, Nick Smith wrote: > >> > >> Here on a 450 MHz G3, I've been using these flags for many > >> months with no > >> problems: > >> > >> CFLAGS="-O3 -mcpu=G3 -maltivec -mabi=altivec > >> -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe" > > > > Does the G3 have altivec extensions? I thought that they didn't > > show up till > > the G4. > > man dont tell me that! i was going with what the guy said and > have almost completed the entire bootstrap with those cflags! i > hope your wrong.....(no offense of course) > > > Erik > If I recall correctly, it won't kill any thing. It might slow somethings down. I just don't know for sure. The -mabi might cause problems with compatibly with precompiled modules. The best thing would be to look it up. I'm no expert on the PPC, but I believe that I am correct in this. Erik
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCGL9OheDjW4eQKVYRAmV8AKCft3taWU58VB5C/DiDOadggIjN9gCdHtGS Jei+SH5tgaefoc6bMzdix/Y= =TZeb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----