Re: PPC cflags

Erik Zeek <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.gentoo.ppc
Organization The University of Georgia
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun February 20 2005 11:41 am, Nick Smith wrote:
> <quote who="Erik Zeek">
>
> > On Sat February 19 2005 10:18 pm, Carl Hudkins wrote:
> >> On Sat February 19 2005 21:49, Nick Smith wrote:
> >>
> >>  Here on a 450 MHz G3, I've been using these flags for many
> >> months with no
> >> problems:
> >>
> >> CFLAGS="-O3 -mcpu=G3 -maltivec -mabi=altivec
> >> -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe"
> >
> > Does the G3 have altivec extensions?  I thought that they didn't
> > show up till
> > the G4.
>
> man dont tell me that! i was going with what the guy said and
> have almost completed the entire bootstrap with those cflags! i
> hope your wrong.....(no offense of course)
>
> > Erik
>

If I recall correctly, it won't kill any thing.  It might slow somethings 
down.  I just don't know for sure.  The -mabi might cause problems with 
compatibly with precompiled modules.

The best thing would be to look it up.  I'm no expert on the PPC, but I 
believe that I am correct in this.

Erik
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCGL9OheDjW4eQKVYRAmV8AKCft3taWU58VB5C/DiDOadggIjN9gCdHtGS
Jei+SH5tgaefoc6bMzdix/Y=
=TZeb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.