Re: openoffice

David Holm <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.gentoo.ppc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello Peter,

On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 13:14 +0200, Peter Kiraly wrote:
[snip]
> I have tried to emerge openoffice (1.1.4-r1), but somehow it did not
> work. I tried three times: first, after four hours of compiling had a
> failure, the second try locked the whole computer, the third try failed
> after about 20 minutes (somewhere around berkleydb, had a segmentation
> problem).

Did the compiler segfault? If it did then it sounds more like a
toolchain/kernel problem than an openoffice problem.

> At the beginning the compiling process has a notification about that
> it's not an easy task, and openoffice is vulnerable for some chflags
> settings. (Beside it's a huge package).
> Is there a special way to emerge openoffice, or shall i just go with the
> -bin package?

You shouldn't have to do anything special, but openoffice is a bit of a
bitch to compile (mostly due to the amount of time it takes though). The
openoffice-bin package is a bit old on ppc, it's based on an RPM. You
can (usually) grab a binary package of openoffice (built on Gentoo) from
my dev page, http://dev.gentoo.org/~dholm/ppc.html


Did you solve your DMA issues?

//David Holm
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCnutbxVDe1wIoqX0RAjLCAJ92r8AVMdZ01AcgQ3NR1OCabpfN0ACdGPI0
m8oKQwZeBRFrhtlkNweh3+4=
=8YBv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.