Re: openoffice
David Holm <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.ppc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Peter, On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 13:14 +0200, Peter Kiraly wrote: [snip] > I have tried to emerge openoffice (1.1.4-r1), but somehow it did not > work. I tried three times: first, after four hours of compiling had a > failure, the second try locked the whole computer, the third try failed > after about 20 minutes (somewhere around berkleydb, had a segmentation > problem). Did the compiler segfault? If it did then it sounds more like a toolchain/kernel problem than an openoffice problem. > At the beginning the compiling process has a notification about that > it's not an easy task, and openoffice is vulnerable for some chflags > settings. (Beside it's a huge package). > Is there a special way to emerge openoffice, or shall i just go with the > -bin package? You shouldn't have to do anything special, but openoffice is a bit of a bitch to compile (mostly due to the amount of time it takes though). The openoffice-bin package is a bit old on ppc, it's based on an RPM. You can (usually) grab a binary package of openoffice (built on Gentoo) from my dev page, http://dev.gentoo.org/~dholm/ppc.html Did you solve your DMA issues? //David Holm
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCnutbxVDe1wIoqX0RAjLCAJ92r8AVMdZ01AcgQ3NR1OCabpfN0ACdGPI0 m8oKQwZeBRFrhtlkNweh3+4= =8YBv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----