Re: Encryption Ciphers
Florian Philipp <lists@f_philipp.fastmail.net> Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:09:22 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.security |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1204304962.6725.5.camel@NOTE_GENTOO64.PHHEIMNETZ> |
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 15:19 -0500, Mansour Moufid wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Florian Philipp > <lists@f_philipp.fastmail.net> wrote: > > One last question for everyone who has read this rather long mail (thank > > you, btw): What exactly is benbi in aes-lrw-benbi:sha256 and what should > > I choose for XTS? The kernel description states plain but essiv and > > benbi work as well. > > > > benbi is an IV generation algorithm. If you look at the dm-crypt > sources [1], benbi stands for "big-endian 'narrow block'-count" (not > sure where they got the `i' from...). There's also one called bewbi, > which I thought was entertaining. > > Sincerely, > Mansour Moufid > > [1] http://www.cs.fsu.edu/~baker/devices/lxr/http/source/linux/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c#L110 Thanks! So, am I right to believe that essiv is the best choice and benbi just some kind of special requirement for lrw or should I stick with what's recommended (although without reasons given for xts), e.g. cbc-essiv, lrw-benbi, xts-plain?
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHyDxCqs4uOUlOuU8RAkamAJ4wifeg5t88oSkA+1wTud6v87V4rQCcDovr 2uwzP03GCqWGKx/d37t3Cm8= =Q40J -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----