Portage rsync security

Florian Philipp <lists@f_philipp.fastmail.net> Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:45:40 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.gentoo.security
Message-ID <1206009940.22869.11.camel@NOTE_GENTOO64.PHHEIMNETZ>
Hi list!

Am I right that there is currently no way portage tries to verify that
the rsync-mirror is not spoofed?

Doesn't that pose a major threat? If I were able to manipulate the
domain name resolution, I could easily trick gentooers into making false
updates and thus executing a malicious program with root-permission on
their machine.


So, why isn't there some kind of public key authentication going on, at
least optionally?

By the way: How does gentoo's gpg-feature work. The man-page doesn't
contain an explanation.
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBH4kBUqs4uOUlOuU8RAqCaAJ4tbou8YNM8OI7xPs5UdDZnQhniRQCbBOqv
Pfao+64HWP1fIBaFi08JOSY=
=VEoD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----