Re: Portage rsync security
Mario Koppensteiner <[email protected]> Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:31:27 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.security |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 07:49:12AM -0400, Mansour Moufid wrote: [...] > for i in $IP > do > $IPT -A OUTPUT -o $EXTIF -p tcp -s $EXTIP -d $i --dport $RSYNC --syn > -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT > $IPT -A INPUT -i $EXTIF -p tcp -s $i -d $EXTIP --sport $RSYNC --syn > -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT I think the last rule is useless. You should not get a respone from a host which is "NEW", because it belongs to package, which was sent out before. > done best regards Koppensteiner Mario
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 186 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (NetBSD) iD8DBQFH4lkfYFxsCclCD48RAvEPAKCVJUtY2JCOvswnQV5A7J701oUGsQCeOUHx LAxf4Ts+YzITQ5OizmKcl08= =5qL3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----