Re: Soliciting feedback for the GLSA-2 format
Yury German <[email protected]> Thu, 9 Jan 2014 21:42:44 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.security |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--Apple-Mail=_44319C43-1E29-4911-9E4C-0D2D27311FC2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 That is the part that would be the most important, as the XML makes = sense to me. The translation from XML to GLSA would be the most = important part so that it is clear to the general populace. Whenever I write things for work I am always using the rule of writing = to the least common denominator, and I can see this part being the most = confusing. Yury German E-Mail: [email protected] PGP/GPG ID: 19EC14B3 On Jan 9, 2014, at 8:35 PM, Tobias Heinlein <[email protected]> = wrote: > On 10.01.2014 00:37, Yury German wrote: >> is this what the users will see as generated from XML? >=20 > That was just a short example explaining the semantics of the new = syntax. >=20 > We haven't discussed yet how it'll show up in the text advisory, = probably something like "Slot 3.2: <3.2.1 >3.4.2". >=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail=_44319C43-1E29-4911-9E4C-0D2D27311FC2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAlLPXisACgkQc57wrRnsFLOxvACfSKp2eR/VFyNS+yt5m8i4hOP6 1bwAoKVbP3QWMdkOPsqr2GiwNskU9zkc =Kh23 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_44319C43-1E29-4911-9E4C-0D2D27311FC2--