Re: Soliciting feedback for the GLSA-2 format
Alex Xu <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Jan 2014 10:05:33 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.security |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --JmWor9hQu6MTdOWnLXK7wwoR9Mo5D3aXf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/01/14 10:02 AM, Sascha Wolf wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I find the new version of GLSA format very interesting, especially > with the backdrop of the automated evaluation of vulnerabilities. >=20 > Would it be possible to specify in which branch of Gentoo, this > program is usually installed? For example, "stable" or "unstable"? >=20 > So you can better see if you are actively involved or not. >=20 GLSAs are not released if all affected versions are ~arch. --JmWor9hQu6MTdOWnLXK7wwoR9Mo5D3aXf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJS0AxBAAoJEOFfLQs172iqor0P/Rk2paJzSE92f0Bxmg527ONy 2cjO1EwZ6EPdvcCh84nVTzBriePN0UwfTxYAopyTjUwq4kxgq/tBKPqSoLeW5VpT TiknMO3SJFsJrxgiNAy9qMgvYGbjN5OVPFLqXH8C3lCo6qKlc6ylqh041cIo4Te0 8UXxVwo5maHZpuBZedJ6DgfLgj1H1eVwLUD06rPp/Ltzfsd0B2eyFyulndIbomt2 ViurJ1FDY0eyctPT0pdj0L1g2h9lT/2tnpewXARQ/9FbU+TCD5cIltL23H0mAtwL G7kwJ0AKHyoj9qxCnPEA+wqwva0vu8bUbBqFMhFQf8PsOlGWAES8uXKF4QGi7OJB 64SusgxegVBqJRVHcO2715HNK6TFAtO5IY0Eez1WVB3HxKd0CuG1w6qQPAwxIi4X M8KAN5qZP3fszW1u6gGJoBE5AhoE7numTmdW4/zuO7ketVcMqAkqEsIelUX/nNGq /wjBlXMKOIUrSc39eVr2ZIVuG91+bpWF/nQW/RiRwE6szEt9lkY5cCcUSeI/ks+d /thG9skEtlu3RM6p2NPhuxhWNL8lvPVMS2pnuQ7wT5Tz0MgCtO1b543BZVuhkDYe lPb+si8RW6Y8P8CDrpgh2IXbifyz/eOnVA5iekoEVHVOdwtWZW0nnVZMj7hWQZ58 6XH2iFKfSoRu0D7SDEuk =pjvX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JmWor9hQu6MTdOWnLXK7wwoR9Mo5D3aXf--