Re: Re: Xen Dom0 using kernel 3.0
"J. Roeleveld" <[email protected]> Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:08:30 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.server |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, August 15, 2011 8:18 am, Pandu Poluan wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 02:29, Joost Roeleveld <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sunday, August 14, 2011 07:20:18 PM Pandu Poluan wrote: >>> On 2011-08-14, Joost Roeleveld <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> (Sorry for top-posting. Gmail Java mobile client sucks.) >> >> (Fixed this for you) >> >>> I was thinking of something similar to XCP ... but with Gentoo as the >>> Dom0. I'll call it GeDZux (Gentoo Domain Zero Linux) :P >> >> A different name would be prefered by myself, not got an idea yet >> though. >> > > No worry. I know it sounds too... wishy-washy/unserious. > > Had originally wanted to call it "Xentoo", but some might mistake it > for Xen2, or worse Xen 2.0. > > Ah well... We'll think of something later :-) Xentoo doesn't sound too bad, actually. >>> The problem would be how to 'streamline' the installation of a >>> GeDZux-based Xen Platform. The SysAdmin already has lots of things to >>> think about; he/she doesn't need to think (too much) about which USE >>> flags to use, what CFLAGS to put in, which packages to emerge >>> *initially*, etc. >> >> I agree, tools to quickly generate/close new domUs based on templates >> would >> help as well. With different options for where the disks are stored: >> - File >> - LVM >> - physical partitions > > By domU here, do you mean Gentoo domU's or general domU's? Any domU. As far as I am aware, any domU can be configured to use any block-backend for the partitions/drives. > Citrix XenServer's 'template' feature comes to mind... Along with cloning/copying/export/....? VMWare ESX has similar options. >>> That is, how to provide sensible defaults yet not irreversibly >>> removing Gentoo's freedom. So, GeDZux will be a Gentoo variant, a >>> 'submetadistro', if you will :P >> >> A profile putting all the necessary tools (xen, kernel, bridge,....) as >> required. > > Aha! Good idea. Let me learn how to make a profile then. That way we can also set default USE-flags suitable for when using Xen. -- Joost