Re: Re: master server and other ideas

=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 23 July 2003 10:28, Kurt Lieber wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 10:20:04AM -0700 or thereabouts, Joby Walker wrot=
e:
> > The biggest issue I have come across is when ebuilds are not package
> > safe.  The current whopper is baselayout.  The full process must be run
> > on each server, because after merging the package it then copies more
> > files from the build dir.  Several have complained about the package to
> > the Gentoo Developers (including bug report #23762) but they don't seem
> > interested in our concerns (the bug report is listed as
> > "Resolved|Wontfix").
>
> Is there a reason why baselayout cannot be built in a package safe format?
> I looked at the bug and agree that Azarah didn't provide much in the way =
of
> details, but I've worked with Azarah long enough to know there's usually a
> good reason behind the decisions he makes.
>
I don't see any reason why it can't be made package safe, or at least fail=
=20
more elegantly as suggested.

> Can we give him the benefit of the doubt, at least?

Yeah, I'm also inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt. But I am goin=
g=20
to go ask him and find out whats up with this. If baselayout really can't b=
e=20
made package safe, we'll know what to expect with future versions as well.
=20

=2D --=20
Ken
[email protected]
//IRC - antifa
=2D -----------------------------------------------------------------
GPG public key: http://kickasskungfu.com/antifa.pubkey.asc
pgp fingerprint 2D6D 67D1 1600 04E0 4AF7 BA7E 26A5 4189 9228 1585
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/HyuBJqVBiZIoFYURAluiAKC4ApU6NikCdwyfI9csUqrMrCzo2QCgqGWa
cKYN3/AmRmqBcnpFVw1yV1Y=3D
=3D2gDw
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
[email protected] mailing list