Re: No console anymore. How to figure this out.
Michael <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <3404284.aeNJFYEL58@rogueboard> |
On Monday, 23 March 2026 01:09:12 Greenwich Mean Time Dale wrote: > On 3/22/26 6:09 PM, Daniel Frey wrote: > > I'm pretty sure that's because modules in the kernel that require it > > automatically pulls it in. It's not on by default. A kernel module > > that requires it has to be selected in the kernel for that to be > > built. > > > > As the binary nvidia drivers are not in the kernel source, it > > doesn't get pulled in via dependency. > > > > I suppose there may be a case for a bugreport to the gentoo-sources > > build - as they could put in an option that pulls in these modules > > for the nvidia driver. However, I don't know if these modules > > require the presence of what gpu driver is selected for their build > > process (this could be a dealbreaker for this option.) > > > > If you use amdgpu, you have to set it as a module. If it's built > > into the kernel, TTM and TTM_HELPER aren't pulled in. > > > > I don't have an AMD GPU in this machine at all, and I remember > > having > > to set amdgpu to a module to get nvidia's framebuffer to work. > > > > Dan > I checked, amdgpu is not enabled here. If I enable it and for some > reason my hardware can't use it, it just doesn't do anything right?? In most cases yes, although there are some conflicting modules you have to enable selectively to stop them fighting over the same hardware. I am thinking of out-of-kernel nvidia Vs in-kernel nouveau, or some old wireless card drivers. > If I recall correctly, drivers are only used if there is hardware > that needs them. My thinking, just enable it, build the kernel, > reboot and if it works, great. If not, no smoke and the computer > doesn't kick me in the sensitive parts either. ROFL In the case of AMDGPU there is no conflict which will affect your nvidia driver or hardware. PS. Can we please continue to avoid top posting on this list? It makes following a thread unnecessarily confusing.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 870 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJPBAABCAA5FiEEXqhvaVh2ERicA8Ceseqq9sKVZxkFAmnBCNsbFIAAAAAABAAO bWFudTIsMi41KzEuMTEsMiwyAAoJELHqqvbClWcZ0c4P/RzJQdLXzPYrWy0jMsDS EqXixYPi4MyRK6bg6AjxUE7Eu5QZ6cQD6YsEkkcP1wln2y/22iLowgPUfHnhc/so xISKC49BL+GWF3lA+u/vVeXE0AAbWgdsaFvyPU6hvDRVHMnr8lyPbrYV36QdPE4w AGKqJj1iQ7Yffh+gR/IX5He/m9faBkrlvjaCQSRoY8sTqu9401WAGQQueFl05SY+ kZdvP8wKASe9UlIUcVr2bLWu3JXAimMjOWDQ1vjqTGHbBzQ0prL+wbxGp2iQdNQ1 qqCx6n6yBlCKzgKo1f7TQl2GZ5O76ZMv92wRLbqZz9fR4h/Xsuc+Vz7FFNJaX2IK Q0msn8bLOEtK03KFMOC5W8/TnmMRlHF4bQZ092JVNdkKhh8dJrEbiSmoEJgF48HD BbnO3Vl4bHJMv16/1SRfoZKMQKJ4ZojihEKjWRzdGpMck73KWCVq1uUlv4VXtuGK C+mj9BVPA/BEA4DBKfx9Y6M3FQcRPGfougFAQP755QDms8+dikh2eooSAWjM5gAs 8VbF2SNgtejrxhym/PbBLhtdqt9IsxXVJj95Jisxd6zE4PLPjegy5DozuVF7YemP AkYULrm/H8vfHngngNMXmuOyS7Wxnj1NZxlPU3uj3RvLaC8JZ+mnTfcuOy1Tg9z1 azrHZD3CpScoeS22JugKmSkU =A/gx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----