Re: Question about -dev thread "Introduction of app-alternatives/coreutils"

Alexis <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.gentoo.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Ionen Wolkens <[email protected]> writes:

> At this stage this is just a proposed change, it doesn't sound 
> like
> it'll go forward for the foreseeable future in this current 
> state given
> the opposition (other less invasive methods were suggested but 
> the
> author does not seem interested, meaning we'll likely keep the 
> status
> quo).
>
> Should also add the change was proposed by a contributor (aka, 
> *not*
> a Gentoo developer), and there is nothing official about this 
> unless
> developers decides they want to go forward with it.
>
> aka, nothing that you (as a user) need to feel concerned about.
>
> It is also not meant to replace coreutils in Gentoo, just 
> provide the
> option for those that want to use the alternative.

i've been following that discussion myself - though i'm not 
actually subscribed to -dev - and i can imagine people being 
concerned by this post by the (as you say, non-dev) contributor in 
reply to a question asked by Dale[a]:

>On Mon, 23 Mar 2026 at 22:15, Dale <[email protected]> wrote:
>> If I just ignore the news item and don't switch, what is going 
>> to
>> break?
>
> Does the news item not make this clear ? If you update world as 
> usual:
> 1 You will recompile coreutils
> 2 Your system now has some critical utils (such as 
> /usr/bin/install)
> present but not owned by any ebuild
> 3 And some less important utils (like /usr/bin/df) missing
> 4 Portage will then proceed with a potentially long merge list
> (hopefully not needing one of the missing utils)
> 5 Until it reaches app-alternatives/coreutils, which creates 
> owned
> symlinks for all the utils
>
> The breakage is step 3. The news item explains how to skip step 
> 4, to
> shorten the breakage duration. If you wanted to opt-in to uutils
> immediately, it would be compiled at step 4 or 0.

which comes across to me as implying that the contributor's 
proposal _would_ cause breakage, regardless of whether people 
wanted to switch to using uutils or not.


Alexis.

[a] 
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/CANQow5KPWC6bt0yg7QXw_xwKCYCjmdL=R1CGtQa7mUuA6OBgyQ@mail.gmail.com/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.