Re: Manual line breaks in emails
Nuno Silva <[email protected]> Mon, 30 Mar 2026 23:08:19 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-03-30, Dave Sizer wrote: > On Sat, 28 Mar 2026, Dale wrote: > >> [...] >> >> I set mailnews.display.disable_format_flowed_support to true and >> that makes it wrap in the message pane no >> matter how wide the pane is. When I narrow the message pane, it >> also narrows the pane with subject, email >> and all that. That pane I need to stay the same. It took me a >> while to get that just right. Now I have >> the massage pane like I want as well, wrapped and not wide. The >> part I'm typing is wide but I can likely >> deal with that. At least I can read messages without hurting my >> neck so much. Saves wear on my chair as >> sometimes I have to twist it around some. >> >> Wrapping in the composer part would be nice but I'm hoping my change >> above doesn't affect what you receive >> tho. Does this message look the same to you on your end? If it >> changes, well, need to find a new plan. >> ;-) >> >> Dale >> >> :-) :-) >> >> P. S. I just recently switched to Thunderbird from Seamonkey. So >> this is a fairly new setup with a new >> user. >> > > This is the first chunk of text I have gotten from you Dale that is > actually flowing correctly on my client. All of your other mails have come > across as hard-wrapped for me. > > I'm having a tough time completely following this thread, but does that > line up? Did you enable format=flowed for only this mail? There have been other e-mails from Dale which were already using format=flowed, including [1], as I noted in [2]. [1] news://news.gmane.io/[email protected] https://public-inbox.gentoo.org/gentoo-user/[email protected] [2] news://news.gmane.io/[email protected] https://public-inbox.gentoo.org/gentoo-user/[email protected] But this one is a multipart message. If your client is displaying only this one with flowed paragraphs, maybe it's still not enabling reflowing and you're seeing something different because it's the text/html part? -- Nuno Silva