Re: The wiki
Alan Mackenzie <[email protected]> Fri, 15 May 2026 15:24:47 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello again, Alexis. On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 11:31:28 +1000, Alexis wrote: > Alan Mackenzie <[email protected]> writes: > >> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki//etc/portage/patches > > That is not a well written page. There is no coherent description > > of how one specifies the version(s) of a package a patch should be > > applied to. Just some cryptic meta-specifications and a few vague > > examples. > Fair. The wiki is a volunteer effort, only a small number of us > are regularly working on it (with much of that work focused on > improving the Handbook), and many of those who contribute / have > contributed to the wiki aren't native/fluent English speakers. i > try to encourage people to help out, but as i say: "Many people > want good documentation; far fewer are willing to help make that > happen." > > The text ought to say what ranges of versions can be specified, and > > how to do so. > Indeed. > Something that typically comes up in discussions about > contributing to the wiki is: "Oh I can't contribute unless I'm > familiar with the subject matter of a given page." Overall, this > isn't the case; there's always work needing to be done that > doesn't require _any_ familiarity with _any_ of the subject > matter, e.g. fixing typos and template usage. But more > specifically, i myself am _often_ not familiar with the subject of > a page that clearly needs work, and this page is a good example. > In this sort of situation, what i end up doing is: > * searching for, and within, any related documentation i can find; > * manually testing scenarios and behaviours (which sometimes > reveals inconsistencies with the docs); and > * occasionally spelunking through source code (including in > languages i only have a vague knowledge of) in order to > understand or clarify certain behaviours. > i appreciate that many - most? - people don't have the time or > inclination to do this. But i'll also say that, for those who are > using Gentoo as a method of getting a deeper knowledge of how > Linux systems can work, improving a wiki page by going through the > above process might be a useful learning exercise, in addition to > being a contribution to the Gentoo community. Some hours ago, I posted that I had amended that wiki page to correct the deficiencies I had complained about. My changes have since been reverted by somebody called "Ris" in a high-handed and arrogant fashion. The page is now as bad and misleading as it ever was. I'm not sure I want to waste any more time on this wiki, if my amendments are goint to get peremtorily discarded like this. > Alexis. > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Flexibeast -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).