Re: USE flag "pdfimport" for binary package "app-office/libreoffice"?
Dr Rainer Woitok <[email protected]> Tue, 19 May 2026 17:52:14 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.gentoo.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Eli, On Monday, 2026-05-18 21:31:29 -0400, you wrote: > ... > >> are there any plans for providing package "app-office/libreoffice" with > >> USE flag "pdfimport" on the binhost? > Note it is not a default USE. Right. Correct me, if I'm wrong, but rumor has it that this is to blame on "app-text/poppler" producing new versions very fast, which then re- quire a rebuild of "app-office/libreoffice". So building "app-office/ libreoffice" without USE flag "pdfimport" saves plenty of rebuilds ei- ther on the binhost or locally. On the other hand, the ability to open and manipulate PDF files is not that exotic a requirement, is it? At least some, if not most binary-on- ly Linux distributions which issue new releases only every now and then do provide "libreoffice" packages which allow manipulation of PDF files. And then: checking the runtime dependencies of "app-office/libreoffice" returns among others >=app-text/poppler-22.06:0/158=[cxx] a version I installed at 2022-08-03, that is, almost four years back. So obviously "app-office/libreoffice" doesn't depend on the most recent "poppler" version. After using Gentoo for seven years now I'm still far from being a Gentoo guru, but Gentoo provides "slots" allowing different versions of some package being installed simultaneously. So couldn't we have a "slower" slot of "app-text/poppler" where only those versions are provided which fix gross errors and security breaches and use this slot for both, building "app-office/libreoffice" on the binhost and running it locally? Just a thought ... Sincerely, Rainer