Re: Speed difference between Agilent 82357B and NI GPIB-USB-HS
dave penkler <[email protected]> Tue, 26 Sep 2023 09:38:04 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.hardware.gpib.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAL=kjP2Jsi24GZcKCDRDz2xBJLg4jzbEDXoL86--ddka_=uawA@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Michael, The drivers are fairly similar in structure so I would not expect there to be much difference at all. The difference can depend on how quickly commands are processed and the GPIB transfer speed. cheers, -Dave On Tue, 26 Sept 2023 at 01:27, Michael K via Linux-gpib-general < [email protected]> wrote: > I have both the Agilent 82357B USB GPIB interface and the NI GPIB-USB-HS > USB interface. > Transactions on the NI device are about 30% slower than the Agilent. (i.e > if a bunch of commands take 150ms to complete on the NI device, they will > do the same in 100ms with the Agilent) > > Is this likely to be a driver difference or is the Agilent device doing a > better job than the NI? > > Michael > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-gpib-general mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-gpib-general > _______________________________________________ Linux-gpib-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-gpib-general