Re: APM enable ?
Tony Godshall <[email protected]> Thu, 7 Aug 2003 19:12:45 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.hardware.sony |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20030808021245.GA24183@sanity> |
According to John S. Andersen, > On 7 Aug 2003 at 17:19, rg wrote: > > > > > Is it a good idea to enable APM in the kernel on the VAIO ? > > What are the pros / cons > > On most recient Vaios the Pros are: > Nothing > The Cons are: > APM is mutually exclusive with acpi > You need acpi in order to get all the periferals to work > If you enable acpi, it will disable apm > if you don't enable acpi, sound, nic, mouse, firewire, usb, > are all subject to flaky operation or no operation. > > So the short answer is most often, its a waste of time... What I've done, pragmatically, with prior laptops is to just compile both acpi and apm as modules, and then seen which worked. On my current laptop, a GRX-560, is ACPI-only, and even then it needs a bleeding edge kernel or acpi.sf.net patches. So I'm currently running 2.6.0-test2 with ACPI compiled in, no APM. (Things like fan and thermal control scare me from some of the stories I've heard on this list.) Tony