Re: Discrepancy between UM3 and Linux-HA.org ?
Gavin Hamill <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.highavailability.ultramonkey |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 18:11:35 +0200 Mattias Andersson <[email protected]> wrote: > That was not really clear was it? Okey, I will try again with an > example. > > I'm not sure I mad myself quite clear... erhm.. hope I did. Ah OK. :) I see the point you're making about the `uname -a` hostname rather than any virtual/clustered/shared hostname... Taking my own setup as an example, I have two physical machines called turnbull and frobisher running as gateways [1] for the LAN, with each being a load balancer. I'm not running any services on the gateways themselves (of course). If I want frobisher to be the normal master, I'm guessing only 'frobisher' should be present in the haresources on *both* machines, yep? The UM3 docs might benefit from some clarification in this department :) Cheers, Gavin. [1] frob is .250, turnbull is .252, they share the gateway .254 address -- Ultra Monkey - http://www.ultramonkey.org/ To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected], with a body: unsubscribe ultramonkey-users [email protected] where "[email protected]" is YOUR email address.