Re: UM3 & High Capacity Highly Availability and Load Balancing problem

maybe you¹ve already answered your own question.  assuming you are using
direct routing, what have you done on the fedora boxes to suppress arp?

On 6/26/07 3:41 PM, "Nathan Brown" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have 2 load balancers setup running debian and 2 web servers setup running
> fedora 7
>  
> My main problem is that when the load balancers first come up and start
> routing traffic everything works fine, I can view ipvsadm and see that it can
> see both web servers just fine.  The problem comes about 20 or 30 seconds
> after the the load balancers starts routing.  What happens is one of the web
> servers drops and then a few moments later the other web server drops and then
> it adds the fail back 127.0.0.1 to the list being the only active server.
>  
> What I cant figure out is why for those first 20 or 30 seconds I can use
> everything wonderfully but after that some catastrophe happens.  Is it an ARP
> issue with fedora?
>  
> I was able to use the debian setup for the real servers without a problem,
> sysctl.conf took the arp setting without error.  The only other thing that
> might throw it I guess would be that my balancers operate on eth0 and the web
> servers operate on eth1
>  
> Let me know if anyone has any suggestions
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ultramonkey-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.vergenet.net/listinfo/ultramonkey-users

_______________________________________________
Ultramonkey-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.vergenet.net/listinfo/ultramonkey-users