Re: delayed activation of backend server
Simon Horman <[email protected]> Fri, 20 Jun 2008 16:48:02 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.highavailability.ultramonkey |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 03:13:22PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > For Zope clusters it would be very practical to be have backendservers > stay out of the active pool until they have been active for a period of > time. Similar to how it checkcount determines how often a service must > have failed its check before it is considered dead it would be nice ot > have a count that determines how often a check much succeed before a > server is considered to be up again. The use case for us is that we want > some extra time to warm up caches in a (re)started Zope server before > adding it to the pool. > > Is this a planned feature for UM? Hi Wichert, that sounds fairly straightforward. I hadn't planed such a feather, but it should be easy enough to add. But I am curious, why is such a thing desirable for Zope clusters? -- Horms _______________________________________________ Ultramonkey-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.vergenet.net/listinfo/ultramonkey-users