Re: heartbeat question
Artyom Khmelnitsky <[email protected]> Mon, 29 Mar 2010 01:44:02 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.highavailability.ultramonkey |
|---|---|
| Organization | AYKsolutions, LLC. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I have done some further reading on LVS/HB and it's just a collection of rpms that need to be installed and that's basically it. Does anyone know how UltraMonkey compares with HAProxy? Thanks Simon Horman wrote: > On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 06:34:09PM -0400, Artyom Khmelnitsky wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> We are thinking of utilizing heartbeat for one of our customers. I have >> been reading up on the ultramonkey website, but was not able to find an >> answer to my question. How does heartbeat choose the backend node? Is it >> done randomly like with rrDNS or does it monitor the webserver's load >> and choose the one with the lowest? >> > > The real-server selection is done by LVS, which is configured > by ldirectord through the ldirectord.cf file. They key is > the choice of scheduler. Typically ultramonkey uses the wlc scheduler, > which basically chooses the scheduler that has the lowest number of > connections. > > A separate project, feedbackd, looked at the idea of monitoring > the load on real-servers and by tweaking their weights in > the LVS table it was able to send more connections to less loaded > servers. > > Is there a particular scenario you have in mind which calls > for scheduling based on server-load? > > > _______________________________________________ Ultramonkey-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.vergenet.net/listinfo/ultramonkey-users