RE: service connect to itself

"Rick Willmore" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.highavailability.ultramonkey
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Should we take this offline ?
R.

________________________________

From: [email protected] on behalf of Horms
Sent: Sun 9/11/2005 11:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: service connect to itself



On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 11:16:28PM -0700, Rick Willmore wrote:
> Interesting.  I have 2 machines which act as the Real servers and one
> of course is the ldirectord hot while the other is standby and I am
> not using iptables.  This should fall under the "High Availability"
> example in the standard section which is also doing load balancing??
> The Real servers are acting as gateway devices as well as load
> balancers.  This is running in RR formation with no issues.  My
> configuration is probably the simplest example so perhaps it doesnt
> apply to this issue.  Correct me if I am wrong and I hope this isnt
> just ignorance on my part.

Rick, I am confused. If you just have high availability,
then you will not have the problem described as you
do not have load balancing.

--
Horms


--
Ultra Monkey - http://www.ultramonkey.org/
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected], with a body:
unsubscribe ultramonkey-users [email protected]
where "[email protected]" is YOUR email address.
winmail.dat (application/ms-tnef, 4.1 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.