RE: mcast-interface

"Davis, Jacob" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.highavailability.ultramonkey
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Very interesting!

I currently have the following line in my apt/sources.list:
deb http://www.ultramonkey.org/download/3/ sarge main 
Which gives me 1.2.3.cvs.20050404-1.0um.1
Is 1.2.3.cvs.20050927 significantly different? I did notice that I had
to edit the LVSSyncDaemonSwap script in my current version in order to
handle --stop-daemon= command syntax correctly.

If I start both master and backup daemons on boot as you suggest, Should
I remove the LVSSyncDaemonSwap line from my haresources file and create
an ipvsadm rc script that looks like this:?

ipvsadm --start-daemon master
ipvsadm --start-daemon backup


Thanks,
-Jake


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Horms
> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 10:08 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: mcast-interface
> 
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 01:25:58PM -0400, Davis, Jacob wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I'm setting up my first LVS HA, load balancing cluster and 
> my question 
> > is about assigning an interface for use by the ipvs_sync 
> daemon. I can 
> > see from the ipvsadm man page that you can pass the 
> --mcast-interface 
> > option on the command line but how should one handle this 
> when it is 
> > started by heartbeat? I contemplated editing the LVSSyncDaemonSwap 
> > resource script but thought there might be a better way.
> 
> LVSSyncDaemonSwap::master::eth1
> 
> Although, these days the kernel lets you run both the master 
> and backup sync daemon simultaneously. So my recommendation 
> is to start them both using ipvsadm at boot.
> 
> If you do want to use LVSSyncDaemonSwap, please use this version of
> heartbeat:
> 
> http://www.ultramonkey.org/download/heartbeat/1.2.3.cvs.20050927/
> 
> > Also, I'd like to know what the recommendation is for where 
> to put the 
> > sync traffic. Should it be on the same interface that is 
> used for the 
> > heartbeat broadcast (a private, crossover network in my 
> case), or is 
> > it better to put this traffic on the same interface that handles 
> > public traffic?
> 
> There shouldn't be much traffic, and its reasonably resistant 
> to packet-loss, so it shouldn't really matter much where you put it.
> 
> --
> Horms


-- 
Ultra Monkey - http://www.ultramonkey.org/
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected], with a body:
unsubscribe ultramonkey-users [email protected]
where "[email protected]" is YOUR email address.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.