Re: Ultra Monkey load balancing configuration problems -- please help.

Horms <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.highavailability.ultramonkey
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Roxana Diaconescu wrote:
> Two more questions, if you do not mind -- I highly appreciate taking
> your time to answer.
> 
> 1) I am interested in setting up a two tier configuration, where the
> requests are balanced between two directors and then, within each
> director, to the corresponding real servers. I am in the process of
> reading the active-active paper. Would the software coming along the
> paper answer this question? At a glance, it seems it would. Could I
> still have my own services instead of standard ones?

I'm not sure what you mean by "coming along the paper", but in general,
multi-tier setups should work fine.

> 2) I am also interested in custom routing with LVS (i.e. Level > 4,
> based on request content). So far I came across KTCPVS from the LVS
> people and Ultra Monkey-L7. They seem to be both level 7 load
> balancers. How do they compare (w.r.t. major features). 

As far as I understand, both are fairly experimental. I did work
on the Ultra Monkey-L7 project a little, however I am not entirely
sure of its current status with regards to reliability and features.
I am even less faminilar with KTCPVS :(

> There is not
> much english documentation on the UM-L7 site -- does it come with the
> distribution?

At this time UM and UM-L7 are separate (though related) projects,
so no the UM-L7 code does not come with UM.

With regards to the documentation, there might be more English material
lying around offline. I have CCed, Kondo-san, he may know more about this.

-- 
Horms                                           
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/          W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/


-- 
Ultra Monkey - http://www.ultramonkey.org/
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected], with a body:
unsubscribe ultramonkey-users [email protected]
where "[email protected]" is YOUR email address.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.