Re: Internal virtual IP failure scenario
Horms <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.highavailability.ultramonkey |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bryn Moslow wrote: > [-- text/plain, encoding quoted-printable, charset: us-ascii, 37 lines --] > > Using the diagram at > http://www.ultramonkey.org/3/topologies/ha-lb-eg.html for reference I > seem to have run into a failure scenario that doesn't have an elegant > solution. > > I've set up a 4 machine cluster almost identical to the diagram and it > works wonderfully except if I pull the cable that would be connected to > the 192.168.7.2 (or 192.168.7.3) interface in the example. If this > interface loses connection there is no failover to the slave. I'm > guessing this is for lack of a ping test to the Real Server network? (I > *am* using a ping test on the External Virtual IP interface to the > gateway.) Are you using ipfail in your heartbeat setup, it should be the elegant solution to this problem. http://www.ultramonkey.org/3/ipfail.html -- Horms H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/ W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/ -- Ultra Monkey - http://www.ultramonkey.org/ To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected], with a body: unsubscribe ultramonkey-users [email protected] where "[email protected]" is YOUR email address.