Re: Internal virtual IP failure scenario

Horms <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.highavailability.ultramonkey
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Bryn Moslow  wrote:
> [-- text/plain, encoding quoted-printable, charset: us-ascii, 37 lines --]
> 
> Using the diagram at
> http://www.ultramonkey.org/3/topologies/ha-lb-eg.html for reference I
> seem to have run into a failure scenario that doesn't have an elegant
> solution.
> 
> I've set up a 4 machine cluster almost identical to the diagram and it
> works wonderfully except if I pull the cable that would be connected to
> the 192.168.7.2 (or 192.168.7.3) interface in the example. If this
> interface loses connection there is no failover to the slave. I'm
> guessing this is for lack of a ping test to the Real Server network? (I
> *am* using a ping test on the External Virtual IP interface to the
> gateway.)

Are you using ipfail in your heartbeat setup, it should be the elegant
solution to this problem.

http://www.ultramonkey.org/3/ipfail.html

-- 
Horms                                           
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/          W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/


-- 
Ultra Monkey - http://www.ultramonkey.org/
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected], with a body:
unsubscribe ultramonkey-users [email protected]
where "[email protected]" is YOUR email address.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.