Re: Internal virtual IP failure scenario
Horms <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.highavailability.ultramonkey |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 12:29:38PM -0700, Bryn Moslow wrote: > Thanks, yes I am pinging the router on the public IP side for ipfail in > my setup. I was hoping to not need to use a Real Server as a ping test. > If the Real Server dies, I believed this would simply result in > ldirectord taking the unreachable Real Server out of the equation but no > fail over. Is this correct, or will the setup be smart enough to see > that the inactive Director is able to reach the Real Server in question > and trigger a fail over? > > It just struck me squarely between the eyeballs that I guess I can fire > the cluster back up and test this on my own. "Duh" for lack of a better > expression... > > Maybe this would be a good/better use of ping_group as well, just adding > the list of Real Servers there. If you are are unable to ping something a bit more solid on the real-server side, like say the switch, then a ping_group that includes all the real servers would be a good second choice. -- Horms H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/ W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/ -- Ultra Monkey - http://www.ultramonkey.org/ To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected], with a body: unsubscribe ultramonkey-users [email protected] where "[email protected]" is YOUR email address.