ping_group broken? (was RE: Internal virtual IP failure scenario)

"Bryn Moslow" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.highavailability.ultramonkey
Message-ID <BC2A76AABABF8741A8ADEE62DB1350F8015EBB27@exchange2.valvesoftware.com>
Sorry, I spaced on including the link to the thread I mentioned.

http://www.archivesat.com/High-Availability_Linux_Project_discussion/thr
ead743064.htm 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bryn
Moslow
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 4:17 PM
To: Horms
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Internal virtual IP failure scenario

Thanks, though I've run into a problem that seems to be specific to the
ping_group directive.

The ping_group I set up with the real servers always shows dead. However
I can ping the Real Servers from each Director. Adding them individually
as just ping targets instead of a group in ha.cf works fine.

I found a thread that claims ping_group is broken in heartbeat 1.2.4. Is
it broken in the 1.2.3 CVS version UM3 appears to be using as well?

-----Original Message-----
From: Horms [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 6:01 PM
To: Bryn Moslow
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Internal virtual IP failure scenario

On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 12:29:38PM -0700, Bryn Moslow wrote:
> Thanks, yes I am pinging the router on the public IP side for ipfail
in
> my setup. I was hoping to not need to use a Real Server as a ping
test.
> If the Real Server dies, I believed this would simply result in
> ldirectord taking the unreachable Real Server out of the equation but
no
> fail over. Is this correct, or will the setup be smart enough to see
> that the inactive Director is able to reach the Real Server in
question
> and trigger a fail over?
> 
> It just struck me squarely between the eyeballs that I guess I can
fire
> the cluster back up and test this on my own. "Duh" for lack of a
better
> expression...
> 
> Maybe this would be a good/better use of ping_group as well, just
adding
> the list of Real Servers there.

If you are are unable to ping something a bit more solid on the
real-server side, like say the switch, then a ping_group that includes
all the real servers would be a good second choice.

-- 
Horms                                           
  H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
  W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/



-- 
Ultra Monkey - http://www.ultramonkey.org/
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected], with a body:
unsubscribe ultramonkey-users [email protected]
where "[email protected]" is YOUR email address.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.