Re: Patch/recommendation for ocf:heartbeat:Filesystem cifs
David Vossel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.highavailability.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stefan Bauer (IZLBW Extern)" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 1:42:14 AM > Subject: [Linux-HA] Patch/recommendation for ocf:heartbeat:Filesystem cifs > > Dear Users/Developers, > > we're using ocf:heartbeat:Filesystem but fail to unmount cifs mounts if the > cifs server went down. > Please consider adding -l (lazy umount) to the umount_force variable in the > RA. Does the umount -f option even make sense for cifs, or should we completely replace -f with -l when cifs is in use? the '-f' option only references NFS in the man page. You could propose this patch as a git pull request if you want. The resource-agent's source code is located here. https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents -- Vossel > With the above option in use, we could unmounts the cifs share cleanly > without running in any timeouts. > > Cheers > > Stefan > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems