Re: Antw: Re: Q: dampening explained?
Andrew Beekhof <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.highavailability.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 9 Sep 2014, at 4:11 pm, Ulrich Windl <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Andrew Beekhof <[email protected]> schrieb am 09.09.2014 um 00:25 in Nachricht > <[email protected]>: > >> On 8 Sep 2014, at 5:19 pm, Ulrich Windl <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> I remember having asked this before, but I'l still missing a good >> explanation: >>> >>> What are the precise semantics of "dampening" (attrd_updater -d)? >>> >>> The manual page just says: >>> -d, --delay=value >>> The time to wait (dampening) in seconds further changes occur >>> >>> Who is waiting? >> >> attrd before it updates the cib > > So the RA sees an extra delay of -d seconds? No. attrd does the waiting, not attrd_updater > >> >>> What changes? >> >> other processes or nodes calling attrd_updater > > So it means that if you call "attr_updater -d X" and then "attr_updater -d Y" the second update will be delayed until at least X seconds since the first update passed? No. It means wait X seconds for another update (locally or on another node) before writing the value to the CIB. If another update does arrive, reset the clock and wait another X seconds. Repeat. Usually only the -d from the first call to attrd_updater has any affect. Subsequent calls re-use the -d value from the first. > If a third "attr_updater -d Z" is called, will the system ensure that at least X + Y seconds passed since the first update before appying the third update? No. > > If the delay is not over, does the next update wait (as I guessed), or is the next update simply ignored? > >> >>> Please explain! > > As you see, there are too many questions that are still unanswered. > >>> (pacemaker-1.1.10-0.15.25 of SLES11 SP3) >>> >>> Regards, >>> Ulrich > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 841 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUDqfnAAoJEBTzwpg4iwmN8HAP/3nzUpPRWE/R+9/7k6yt5nu7 Tfgm4YK7UCzGy6lP4uNeKDLAkUjenWPZeMHPJq0PvREYjmxPfkI8I+A9W66oNzC4 veP+OQc7Hmc4kGmgzmgXoXSIMXcGuo6s5UqhqhEcxOKO7ubxpYikkM01hnAA7hN4 S5WOEvmctrRrrxNvLF3Lolq7WlVWkOE2P6kGe6XHtyTnSWAwa6BLiumKxYUGWE7A v4oLBSDJVr0pw7EqRgFggGC56lw7diyma1x2DfHH1M6HGnFYsYLUJzgT8jXFunwE AgdCJ7PYZEZROA5CMhcWhaqWPuyGfDlABW2kYSX9aKtgTiG5s+6W0dCujpeC0+xQ AlNWdx5r04yctc84NP31RgakRIWKelIKy/3R+qT1z4Q15zzrr3lPh7uTudw/dhWD wOdkSotamesGdaJWJuPhkBXMeeqSDSYeljDjXZrrLDzMxNbvtixzv5avCyTJpwNR 7SpF1G5OF+rvJmmyOk8Ux6u7TPfdirf2o7f93IYaN6p7F1dGdp5bagvorYwuYxvK G/hZq5nhNu03iP+MDO5gFI2eUph+ORnbAbjwCQ14GITlEH6CSFWXSaI95IqJXNew nKKdsRakySGX7gkmtFa2+nBs3WwgfIw/NiXpcLYc/44OCoAaPtf4D1Eks8VPoccv CxxDcZZxfmCUU8HCbQQa =mu6w -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----