Re: Corosync 1 -> 2
Andrew Beekhof <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.highavailability.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2 Oct 2014, at 12:44 am, Digimer <[email protected]> wrote: > On 01/10/14 10:40 AM, Greg Woods wrote: >> I notice that the "network:ha-clustering:Stable" repo for CentOS 6 now >> contains Corosync 2.3.3-1 . I am currently running 1.4.1-17 . Is it safe to >> just run this update? Are there configuration changes I have to make in >> order for the new version to work? (If there is a document or wiki page >> describing how to convert from Corosync 1 to 2, I would be happy to be >> pointed to it). >> >> Thanks, >> --Greg > > Personally, I would not upgrade. If you do, you will want to test outside of production first. > > Corosync needed cman to be a quorum provider in the 1.x series. In 2.x, it became it's own quorum provider and cman was no longer needed. Last I heard upstream, pacemaker on EL6 is only supported on corosync 1.4 + cman. I'm sure you're not concerned about paid support, but it does mean that the corosync 1.4 stack is much better tested on EL6 than 2.x is. Also keep in mind that the version of pacemaker that comes with CentOS 6 wont work with this version of corosync You will need to rebuild it (or also obtain it from "network:ha-clustering:Stable" - which might not be automatic depending on what versions both have) > > If you really want a corosync v2+, then I would recommend switching to CentOS 7. > > -- > Digimer > Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ > What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 841 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJULHrPAAoJEBTzwpg4iwmNUncQAIamRT9sMjZ8Ov30hpHacyGI NunT10JUuWKPbzaA3Gv7viXPLY7mQMnpAEHzUjRSs4+uA6eXHIJSfQ7HarhZ62PQ cd7U5Bt8ddgmcgbQTk6G/BzCWRYUyKss+jo9RPx6mnc1btz2wirOAu2hWU6/4dXa HW4ns57WvKu7P8Wqsq1Bvdjns88A6w/qCp0+wFOwiVBGC3GLevRtHJyP8tsqM/tm vot+a2L3+ypRtGy83fFYVMPz5Dg41CIlR9W9LPH9W3uhmxX2IUZF1K23TLJUBslp MqCK4T9Vm2mI8Kxpay6+opN9rz05k11w31+zPyiCPoa6V6w9X+K+Ar2NKHKExOm/ qWTOB56NRE17Kj/hATeaiXHG7GBOxkxy0k4569c4TGn4nq1bsDqFHA7FDW8yfYMJ oRIOQPJm67ZRBvCPvpT6saxL7VE79cA9cVEaoDKX40Q3+Vqfg2oNxuGFfHJaieGw wQKYAoUyU/+ScIsu3Orru4dXUtvuDBfaHjSLDUSY/iBTlcCJzp9iKW5h9HZhxucV BXVoYEvAhrJ2EN+uCsRjA8wa0otgRhHN9aVpXhTzm3CtiJEVOuQGCGSPjPAlwDtO zguvDIxNYqquWTAVPqrvWHlUi6q+NcuIk2oATljcnZRay6a74xrZC6mspPmRjbT1 n+gZ4T1x9Klxpfu62YlG =YWOu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----