Re: Corosync 1 -> 2

Andrew Beekhof <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.highavailability.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2 Oct 2014, at 12:44 am, Digimer <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 01/10/14 10:40 AM, Greg Woods wrote:
>> I notice that the "network:ha-clustering:Stable" repo for CentOS 6 now
>> contains Corosync 2.3.3-1 . I am currently running 1.4.1-17 . Is it safe to
>> just run this update? Are there configuration changes I have to make in
>> order for the new version to work? (If there is a document or wiki page
>> describing how to convert from Corosync 1 to 2, I would be happy to be
>> pointed to it).
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> --Greg
> 
> Personally, I would not upgrade. If you do, you will want to test outside of production first.
> 
> Corosync needed cman to be a quorum provider in the 1.x series. In 2.x, it became it's own quorum provider and cman was no longer needed. Last I heard upstream, pacemaker on EL6 is only supported on corosync 1.4 + cman. I'm sure you're not concerned about paid support, but it does mean that the corosync 1.4 stack is much better tested on EL6 than 2.x is.

Also keep in mind that the version of pacemaker that comes with CentOS 6 wont work with this version of corosync
You will need to rebuild it (or also obtain it from "network:ha-clustering:Stable" - which might not be automatic depending on what versions both have)

> 
> If you really want a corosync v2+, then I would recommend switching to CentOS 7.
> 
> -- 
> Digimer
> Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
> What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education?
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 841 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
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=YWOu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.