Antw: Re: [crmsh] Question about latest crmsh.

>>> Kristoffer Grönlund <[email protected]> schrieb am 28.11.2014 um 11:06 in
Nachricht <[email protected]>:

[...]
>> When we used Pacemaker1.0, results seem to be different.
>> Are these specifications of new crm command?
>>
> 
> Yes, this is the new CLI syntax for crmsh. Where possible, crmsh now
> tries to avoid adding the double quotation marks.

Like it was in SGML, but then cam XML, and you needed the quotes. Personally
I'd prefer strings in quotes, numbers without...

> 
> 
>> Q2) When we executed the next command, ocf:heartbeat is not displayed.
>>
>> (snip)
>> [root@snmp1 ~]# crm configure show
>> (snip)
>> primitive prmDummy2 Dummy \
>>         op start interval=0s timeout=300s on-fail=restart \
>>         op monitor interval=10s timeout=60s on-fail=restart \
>>         op stop interval=0s timeout=300s on-fail=block
>> (snip)
>>
>> When we used Pacemaker1.0, results seem to be different.
>> Are these specifications of new crm command?
>>
> 
> Yes, this is also a new feature in crmsh. When using agents from
> ocf:heartbeat:, crmsh does not display the prefix part.

Why not ocf:pacemaker? I don't see any benefit: You yould just decide to leave
"ocf:" out...

> 
>> Q3) We used the editing feature in the next procedure, but it is not 
> changed.
>> Is a procedure of our editing wrong?
> 
> Unfortunately, this is a bug in pacemaker, fixed very recently:
[...]

Regards,
Ulrich

_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems