Question around resources constraints (pacemaker on RHE7.1)
"MOULLE, ALAIN" <[email protected]> Fri, 21 Aug 2015 13:27:41 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.highavailability.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <DF84CFF8A85AB546B2D53FFF122677270220DA@FRAUVJ99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> |
Hi I can't find a way to configure constraints in pacemaker so that with these= resources: Res1 Res2 Res3 Res4 Res5 with current colocation constraints : Res2 with Res1 Res3 with Res2 Res4 with Res1 Res5 with Res4 and current order symmetrical constraints : Res2 after Res1 Res3 after Res2 Res4 after Res1 Res5 after Res4 and migration-threshold=3D1 on all resources . What I want it that if I have a failure for example on Res3 is that all th= e 5 Ressources are migrated. Is there a solution ? For example , with an HA LVM configuration and VM resources : Res1=3DVGA Res2=3DFS-img-VM1 (where are the VM1 image and .xml) (FS-img-VM1 is on VGA = LV) Res3=3DVM1 Res4=3DFS-img-VM2 (where are the VM2 image and .xml) (FS-img-VM1 is on anot= her VGA LV) Res5=3DVM2 So current constraints are so that VGA is activated before the FS-img is mo= unted and before the VM is started. But I want that if the VM1 fails, it can migrate on another node (together = with all other 4 resources) but with only the constraints above, the VGA st= alls the migration of the VM ... Is there any solution by constraints configuration ? Note : we can't use group resources for now, because VMs are remote-nodes. Thanks Alain Moull=E9 _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list is closing down. Please subscribe to [email protected] instead. http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha